Showing posts with label Pakistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pakistan. Show all posts

Thursday, 7 March 2013

Laughing in the Dark: a snapshot from the Lahore Literary Festival

The British Council recently enabled me to travel to Pakistan to visit the first Lahore Literary Festival. The festival itself and the opportunity to glimpse Pakistan behind the news headlines provided an enlightening, refreshing experience, and one that will remain with me a long time. The following is a set of reflections on what I saw and the thoughts it inspired in me. For an excellent insight into the social impact of the festival, I recommend an article from the Indian Express entitled ‘Literature and Longing in Lahore’.


I discovered literature through attending festivals.

Although much of my childhood was spent with my head in a book and as I grew up it was in relation to characters in books that I increasingly understood my own identity and ambitions, it was only with attending literary festivals in my early-twenties that I encountered literature as a social, communal experience and started to engage with the world of literature beyond that contained within a book. Being read to, meeting authors, the buzz of an excited audience discussing big ideas, feeling involved in something bigger than one person sitting in a chair with a book: it was all this I fell in love with and that transformed me from a compulsive reader into someone who wanted to make a career in literature. Nothing can replace the private experience of reading a book, but for provocation and immersing yourself in literature and the world, there is nowhere like a festival.

That I’m talking so idealistically about festivals is due in no small part to my experience in Lahore. I had not realised how inadvertently blasé I had become about festivals – there’s one almost every week in the UK and authors are reeling under the expectation to promote a book at every conceivable opportunity – until surrounded with the energy of a new festival in a city recently starved of cultural opportunity.

Imagine living in a society where cinemas have closed down having been targeted by terrorists, sports teams no longer visit, and even the fabled kite flying Basant that heralds the coming of spring and covers the city in a brightly coloured blanket each February has been cancelled. And now imagine that into this desert comes a literary festival, complete with authors from around the world, high profile Pakistani writers, discussions on themes such as ‘Literature and Resistance’ and ‘The Globalisation of Pakistan’s Literature’, and the chance to discuss political troubles in a secular public space.

In such circumstances, the raucous, almost bawdy yet respectful atmosphere that was like nothing I’ve ever experienced at a festival starts to make sense. The very existence of the festival was an act of social defiance that said things like this can happen safely in modern Pakistan. That it passed off so positively may mark a watershed for the city.

Had it not been with British Council, I never would have thought to visit Pakistan. In fact, I’d have been terrified to. Yet three days there showed me how narrow such a viewpoint would have been. The Lahore I encountered was populated with friendly, warm, engaged, intelligent, liberal people. We were safe walking the streets both around the festival and the old city centre, were welcomed as tourists into Mosques, and saw nearly nobody wearing the burqa. It was a city I felt comfortable in.

‘I feel like our generation has been deprived of so much this city has to offer’, wrote @azafark on Twitter as the early Spring sunshine appeared in the sky above Lahore for the second day of the festival. Crowds bulged. If the auditoriums of the Alhamra Art Centre were two-thirds full at 9am on the first day, they were bursting at the seems and spilling into the aisles by the second. The festival concluded with a conversation between William Dalrymple and Ahmed Rashid on ‘Cultures in Conflict’. Outside the queue of those who couldn’t get in snaked around the paths of the centre. I quickly abandoned any hope of attending and settled into people watching as they crowds enthusiastically discussed what they had seen and heard during the day.

In total, more than 15,000 people came through the festival over the two days. The audiences were made up of an even split between men and women, and ranged in age from teenagers through to those in their late eighties. If a theme emerged from the festival it was the state of Pakistan: its difficulties, challenges, and international standing. There was no shying away from recent troubles, but a pragmatic approach to the future abounded. ‘Yes we have challenges. But that is not who we are,’ said Nadeem Aslam, whose recently published fourth novel, The Blind Man’s Garden is both a metaphor for, and exploration of, life in Pakistan over the past decade. Reading from the book he treated the audience to the first chapter, where the main character, Rohan, recalls a conversation he had when his son was a child. On finding Jeo distressed by a story, ‘Rohan had given a small laugh to comfort him and asked,
    ‘But have you ever heard a story in which the evil person triumphs at the end?’
    The boy thought for a while before replying.
    ‘No,’ he said, ‘but before they lose, they harm the good people. That is what I am afraid of.’'

It was a passage that resonated with me and, I suspect, the entire audience. At other points in the weekend, a range of other writers responded to the challenges of the day. Lahore born prominent left-wing academic Tariq Ali echoed the sentiments of Rudyard Kipling a century earlier in calling for the teaching of history through stories and narratives so as to keep it alive and prevent aberrations such as the Taliban occurring. Discussing satire, Mohammed Hanif and Moni Mohsin argued that in difficult times ‘you have to laugh in the dark,’ especially when ‘the darkness keeps getting darker…and the lightness more hysterical.’

Elsewhere passionate debates about national identities and self determination brought anger towards the behavior of both Pakistan and India in Kashmir, and dismay at the utter breakdown in political relations between the two. And yet conversation returned time and again to the question of whether literature can actually change anything. There’s a dichotomy in literature between the quiet, private artform we all fall in love with, and how that then impacts on the world itself. No author involved was able or willing to categorically suggest that either writing or festivals alone can change the world. Yet there was a sense that, in ‘building self resistance’ (Selma Dabbagh) and ‘letting you live’ (Basharat Peer) they can change people. And how else is the world changed?

‘Now that it's over,’ writes Komail Aijazuddin in the Indian Express, ‘the energy and intensity conjured over the last few days have nowhere to go. I am anxious, but for once it is because of something we've gained, not lost.’ I had expected my experiences in Pakistan to be somewhat different to the Pakistan of the news. But what I encountered was a as far from that which we see as it is possible to get. The country has its significant problems to overcome. They were openly discussed and will take time and concerted effort to resolve. Yet the people I met convinced me that better times lie ahead for the people of Lahore. They certainly deserve it. And in the meantime, they now have a literary festival that can only go from strength to strength.

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

Shame - Salman Rushdie

Read: June 2009

Shame in one tweet-sized chunk:
A targeted satire of Pakistani politics yet presenting the characters in a human light, Shame is of the very first order.


Shame is one of Salman Rushdie's least considered novels, falling as it does between the megastardom of Midnight's Children and the public controversy of The Satanic Verses. But for many reasons it is one of the most interesting. It sees Rushdie narrating his own novel, offering commentary and personal insight into the events which take place in a way he does not do elsewhere. Given his Islamic upbringing, disappointment at his parents decision to move to Pakistan in 1964, and hatred of religious fundamentalism in all its forms, it is easy to see Shame as his most personal and angry novel too.

Having looked at the effects of partition on India in Midnight's Children, Shame sees him crossing the border into Pakistan to look at the social currents and political imperatives which led to the turbulent decade between one military dictatorship and another. Most specifically it a re-imagining of the lives of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and General Zia-ul-Haq who between them ruled Pakistan for seventeen years. Having known each other since a young age and with their wives being distantly related, Raza Hyder and Iskander Harappa's lives have always been tied up with each other. They each rise to powerful positions in state apparatus, Old Razor Guts as a successful military leader, and Harappa as a beguiling politician, and for a while it seems that together they can take on the world. But things are not as they seem: the affairs of state are set to be the stage for feelings of shame and all the righteous vengeance it engenders to be played out on a grand scale. What is begun by a shameless man with a loose mouth ends many years later in a military coup, dictatorship, and execution. “Wherever I turn,” Rushdie comments early on, “'there is something of which to be ashamed. But shame is like everything else; live with it long enough and it becomes part of the furniture.” As a work of targeted satire, which lampoons the absurdities of major political trends in Pakistan and yet presents the characters in a human and understandable light, Shame is of the very first order.

This shame is not solely confined to politics however, it is everywhere. This is most clearly seen in the life of Sufiya Zinobia, the damaged daughter of Raza Hyder and his wife Bilquis, born blushing and thereafter referred to by her mother as 'Shame,' a personification of the many faces of shame. Throughout the novel it is she who suffers when shame is experienced until finally the shame takes her over completely which disastrous results and unmistakable portents of doom.

Packed with a host of characters, thought provoking themes, and the usual vibrant exciting prose, Shame is typical Rushdie. If you like his smart, conversational style, fusing of cultures, and desire to get his teeth into an idea then you'll love this. One of the things I love about his work but only finally understood halfway through this book is the way he brings his prose to life, not just figuratively but physically as well. He doesn't only use metaphor to shed light on something, but actually makes it a physical aspect of the character or plot. Here not only does he have characters which represent 'shame' and 'shamelessness' but when he says that Sufiya is engulfed by her shame that is exactly what happens. Ideas aren't just explored in theory, they are brought to life in vivid detail through the many events of the vast novel.

Shame can even be read on many levels. On one hand it is a damning satire of the political mess in Pakistan since partition and an impassioned voice against religious fundamentalism. On another, and like The Satanic Verses it is about the immigrant experience and the value of immigration to society. There is even a way of reading it as a reimagining of the Beauty and the Beast fairytale. And in the end it is all of these. Pigeon-holing is rarely possible in a Rushdie novel. There is just too much going on.

Above all it is a good yarn, driven forward by the hallucinogenic quality of the writing. And towards the end Rushdie even offers a personal and impassioned argument in favour of liberal democracy. Talking about the fate of fundamentalist religious states he writes:
“Few mythologies survive close examination, however. And they can become very unpopular indeed if they're rammed down people's throats...In the end you get sick of it, you lose faith in the faith, if not
qua faith then certainly as the basis for a state. And then the dictator falls, and it is discovered that he has brought God down with him, that the justifying myth of the nation has been unmade. This leaves only two options: disintegration, or a new dictatorship...no, there is a third, and I shall not be so pessimistic as to deny its possibility. The third option is the substitution of a new myth for the old one. Here are three such myths, all available from stock at short notice: liberty; equality; fraternity.

“I recommend them highly.”


8 out of 10